Putin Running The Duma: A Quest for Stability, Regardless of Democratization

by Mihai Varga,

The institutional change on the level of Executive-Legislative relationships initiated through the Putin Presidency, although less visible than the prolonged stand-offs between Yeltsin and the Congress or the consequences related to the adoption of the 1993 Constitution, is apt to produce results at least as spectacular. Certainly some of the features of the Putin presidency provide positive prospects for the State-Duma’s functioning: the last four years of office proved that until now, the President has sought to give the legislation he initiates the legitimacy of parliamentary control and approval, and that he is committed to keep the Duma the main stage for law-making. On the other hand, further obstruction of party participation in government formation, administrative pressure on political parties through the 2001 party law, the transformation of regional elites into enemies of federal parties through maneuvering in and around the Federation Council, and, most of all, recent State Duma elections suggest that the Duma’s part in the near future will remain subsidiary.

published in Vol 4 - No 2 - 2004 // Minorities And Ethnic Politics
ABSTRACT
FOCUS
PAPERS

  Site Meter

Indexed in:

  • Social Sciences Citation Index
    (ISI Thomson Reuters)
  • IPSA
  • GESIS
  • CIAONET
  • EBSCO
  • CEEOL
  • EPNET

International
Advisory Board

  • Alina Mungiu-Pippidi (chair) Hertie School of Governance
  • Larry Diamond Stanford University
  • Tom Gallagher University of Bradford
  • Alena Ledeneva University College London
  • Michael McFaul Stanford University
  • Dennis Deletant Georgetown University
  • Helen Wallace London School of Economics and Political Science

Editorial Board

  • Claudiu Tufiș
  • Bogdan Iancu
  • George Jiglau
  • Ingi Iusmen
  • Gabriel Bădescu
  • Andrei Macsut
  • Laura Voinea

Published by:

Societatea Academica Romana